Now that you're all here...
Published on June 29, 2005 By philomedy In Current Events
Let me go ahead and say, first and foremost, that this article is not about the president's speech last night, because I did not watch the president's speech last night. The title was simply a brilliant little ploy on my part to get you all here. As I write this, however, I can't help but make one little point about the speech, the contents of which I've managed to gather from various front page headlines:

Was everyone really that shocked that the man is still connecting 9/11 to Iraq? Come on, folks, if he wasn't convinced a year ago, he's not gonna be convinced now. He who does not want to see the truth will be forever blind, no matter how many people put that magnifying glass in front of his face. That being said, I don't see what the hell everyone's problem was with what he said...but then again I don't see why everyone's panties got all bunched up over what Karl Rove or Dick Durbin said either.

Anyways, this article is not about the speech, because as I mentioned, I did not watch the speech. The problem is that I could not watch anything else either. That is because all, I repeat, ALL of the major networks (and even some of the minor ones) had the damn speech on!!! CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, FOX, and Univision all had the damn speech on at the same damn time!!!

WHY??? WHY??? FOR THE LOVE OF SWEET ALL FORGIVING CHRIST, WHY?????

I was reduced to having to watch one of four things: A rerun of Julia Child, a rerun of Bewitched, All Of Us on UPN, or some third-rate Rambo wannabe thing on the Spanish channel. If you don't speak Spanish, eliminate the last choice from the list, and accept my deepest condolences, as you were obviously worse off than me.

Now, let me explain what was wrong with the situation last night. Julia Child, for all her culinary talent, was, (God bless her soul) a beast of a woman. She was built like a linebacker. She frightens me. If I woke up and saw her shadow on my wall, I would assume Dr. Frankenstein had rented the spare space in the cellar and spawned something. Add all that to the fact that she moves about as quickly as Cool Whip, and you will see why her show completely fails to hold my attention.

Bewitched is a sitcom. That in itself is unacceptable, unless the sitcom was created during the period of time between 1992 and 1999 when sitcoms were any good. Anything created outside of the timetable is worthless and not worthy of my time. For examples on both ends of the spectrum, see the aforementioned Bewitched (pre-1992) or Coupling (post-1999). For clarification, that is the American Coupling, not the British one. The British, I'm happy to report, still know what the word funny means.

So we move on to All Of Us, a sitcom on UPN. I think this one explains itself.

So now, I am left watching bad Rambo in Spanish with a cast of the same 8 actors that appear in every Goddamn weak spin-off movie to be filmed in Spanish. Lovely.

So, then, on to the point. Here is what I propose: Make this like the Super Bowl, or the NBA finals, or any other major sporting event. All of the networks are obviously clamoring for these political event ratings, so let them bid on the rights to broadcast political speeches exclusively. You put up the cash, you get 100% of the viewership, you collect on 100% of the advertising, capitalism works, and I don't have to tear my hair out while listening to Juan Rambo bitch about how he didn't get any "respeto" after coming back from Vietnam. (THE DAMN MOVIE WAS SET IN MEXICO!!! WHY WOULD HE HAVE COME BACK TO MEXICO FROM VIETNAM!?!?!)

Anyways, I think that my proposal provides a happy solution for everyone. Y'all can watch the speech, and as long as NBC doesn't win the bidding wars, I can sit down to enjoy Who Wants To Be A Hilton.

That is all.

Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jun 29, 2005
I wasn't even aware it was on last night until I got on JU this morning.

My husband and I spent last night playing Destroy All Humans and Trivial Pursuit.

Wasn't a problem for me.
on Jun 29, 2005
Oh, and excellent imagery on Julia Child. Very good bit of writing.
on Jun 29, 2005
My husband and I spent last night playing Destroy All Humans and Trivial Pursuit.


Yeah, I succumbed to MLB 2006 myself.

Oh, and excellent imagery on Julia Child. Very good bit of writing.


Thank you.
on Jun 29, 2005
Nice headline ploy, I have to admit, it hooked me in! ;~D

As for Iraq and 9/11, why does anyone question the connection anymore? 9/11 was a terrorist attack against the U.S. and the War on Terror is a result of all the anti western attacks agaisnt the U.S., not just 9/11. If you woke up on that fateful day and suddenly discovered that there are Muslim Extremists who want nothing more than to see all western culture dead, then you probably don't see a connection between 9/11 and the war in Iraq.

However, if you have some sense of history, you can see that Muslim extremists have been at war with western culture since the 70s, we merely decided we weren't going to lay still and take it anymore.

Again, great headline hook, good article!!
on Jun 29, 2005
I turned off my cable service about four years ago, and have never looked back.

If I want to watch TV, I just Netflix the TV series of my choice. Or a movie. I know this means I'm never up to date on this season's popular show, but hey, I'm not that interested in keeping up with the latest pop culture fads anyway. Most of the good TV shows are getting released to video on a regular basis anyway.

Besides, I'm a big sucker for continuity in a show, it's damn hard to keep up with storylines when it means having to carve the same time block out of your week for that purpose, week in and week out, for months at a time. My life isn't that regular, and if it was, I'd be damn embarassed to say that all my free time is based on the TV Guide.

I know, I know, there's TiVo. I've actually used TiVo in the past, and I think it's one of the best things since POW camps. But TiVo also costs money. Below is the full train of thought that led to me cancelling both my cable and TiVo services.


+ I can't watch broadcast TV, because the reception is crap and the choices are limited.
+ So if I'm going to watch TV at all, I'm going to have to pay for cable. That way I get good reception, and a wide range of choices.
+ Of course, cable TV costs money, so if I get it, I'm going to have to actually watch TV.
+ But I don't want my life to be based on the Fall Programming Schedule, so I'm going to have to get TiVo (or some other PVR system) to record my shows so I can watch them on my own schedule.
+ Of course, TiVo costs money, too.
+ It's not like money is a serious problem for me, but I could sure benefit from a bit more fiscal discipline, and
+ As it turns out, Netflix is cheaper than cable+TiVo, has a large enough catalog of movies and TV shows to keep me occupied without ever having to watch current programming again, and is convenient enough to fit into my overall viewing habits.

In the last four years, I have never once regretted this decision.


First Rule of Netflix: If a TV show is worth your time, it will be released on DVD soon enough.
Second Rule of Netflix: While you're waiting, there will be several other TV shows worth watching, that have been released on DVD already, with which you can pass the time between now and the DVD release of 24 Season 4 or whatever.
on Jun 29, 2005
One might ask, why should someone listen to you when you've made up your minda about Bush without having listened to his speech?
on Jun 29, 2005
Obviously, I didn't watch the speech last night (introduced my sweetie to Kill Bill, instead). Not only because of the whole "no TV" thing, but also because I'm a hardcore rightwing conservative nutjob, and I always agree with Bush no matter what he says, so why bother?
on Jun 29, 2005
As for Iraq and 9/11, why does anyone question the connection anymore? 9/11 was a terrorist attack against the U.S. and the War on Terror is a result of all the anti western attacks agaisnt the U.S., not just 9/11. If you woke up on that fateful day and suddenly discovered that there are Muslim Extremists who want nothing more than to see all western culture dead, then you probably don't see a connection between 9/11 and the war in Iraq.


But Iraq did not attack the U.S. That's all I want to get at. Osama Bin Laden did. And Osama Bin Laden is still free to plan another attack. I don't debate the fact that there were probably terrorists in Iraq, as there probably are in all the other Middle Eastern countries that we didn't invade, as there probably are in the United States. I just think we should get the one that attacked us first. That added to the fact that we didn't attack Iraq "to get terrorists", we attacked Iraq "to get WMDs". A little more honesty would have gone a long way.

But hey, I said that I don't have a problem with what he said. I was just giving my two cents about the backlash.

Again, great headline hook, good article!!


Thanks.
on Jun 29, 2005
I turned off my cable service about four years ago, and have never looked back.


I don't rearrange my time around television, but I have not extracted itself from the stranglehold to the extent that you have. I envy your freedom, my brother.
on Jun 29, 2005
One might ask, why should someone listen to you when you've made up your minda about Bush without having listened to his speech?


One might ask, why should someone listen to you when you've obviously made up your mind without reading past the second paragraph of the article, despite the fact that none of the article actually says one thing or another about the way that I feel about the president.
on Jun 29, 2005
Damn, a 28 minute speech ruined your entire evening like that?

You need to get out more, Phil.


I didn't say it ruined my evening, it's just annoying. No one needs it on every channel. It doesn't extend to just presidential speeches. Did everyone need to see the O.J. chase for that entire afternoon? Did everyone need to see the lovely aerial footage of the ocean for 9 hours when JFK Jr's plane went down?
on Jun 29, 2005
Oh, and I have to agree with stute, Netflix is worth every penny.

Between that and digital cable with video-on-demand (not to be confused with pay per view, video-on-demand is included in the price, and not only offers tons of movies, but the best of cable favorites, like National Geo, Discovery, A&E, which you can watch at your leisure, pausing or stopping whenever, kinda like TivO) we never have to suffer through the awful, awful experience you had last night.


But if you don't want to or can't afford to get these things, you're pretty much screwed. I just don't see why that's necessary.
on Jun 29, 2005
Reply By: PhilomedyPosted: Wednesday, June 29, 2005


But Iraq did not attack the U.S.


yes Iraq did attack us, shooting at jets in a no fly zone is an act of war.
on Jun 29, 2005
One might ask, why should someone listen to you when you've made up your minda about Bush without having listened to his speech?


Because maybe he had absolutely nothing new to say. Same ol' drivel.
on Jun 29, 2005
yes Iraq did attack us, shooting at jets in a no fly zone is an act of war.


Why were there jets in the no-fly zone? (That's not sarcasm, that was a legitimate question)

Aside from that, weighing shooting at planes in a no-fly zone vs. smashing a plane into large buildings on our mainland, I'd have to prioritize with the latter at the top of the list. And while Iraq is no longer shooting at our planes, the guy who put together 9/11 is still there.

As I said earlier, I wouldn't have had so much of a problem if the president had just been honest about the reason for going into Iraq, but he wasn't. All it would have taken was the phrase "Saddam is a bad man and we need to get him." Fine. Good. Go. Get. But we had to enter 9/11 and terrorism and WMD's into it, didn't we? I just don't like being lied to.
3 Pages1 2 3